The Palestine-Global Mental Health Network strongly condemns the dishonest and inflammatory petition circulated by an ad hoc group calling itself Psychologists Against Antisemitism. This group does not formally represent the American Psychological Association (APA), yet it falsely postures as an authoritative body, exploiting APA channels to push a politically motivated agenda aimed at suppressing legitimate criticism of Israeli state violence. Alarmingly, several signatories of the petition hold prominent positions within the APA, giving the false impression that this document speaks for the association as a whole.
The petition is a textbook example of misinformation—a tactic the APA itself has warned against. The APA must acknowledge that this petition itself is a clear case of misinformation—one that has tangible and harmful consequences. It distorts critiques of Israeli apartheid and military aggression into accusations of antisemitism, undermining the real fight against discrimination while enabling the suppression of Palestinian rights and advocacy.
Exploiting Jewish Identity to Shield Israeli Crimes
A particularly dangerous aspect of this petition is its presumption to speak on behalf of all Jewish people while falsely equating expressions of horror and outrage over Israel’s mass destruction in Gaza with antisemitism. As Dr. Roy Eidelson, a Jewish psychologist and president of APA’s Division 48 (Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence), has pointed out in his own response to this petition:
“Yet the petitioners seemingly portray expressions of horror and outrage over this mass destruction as instances of antisemitism.”
This deliberate conflation serves a singular purpose: to shield Israel from accountability by framing criticism of its military atrocities as a form of bigotry. Dr. Eidelson further clarifies that:
“But accusations of antisemitism that are used to silence, harass, and punish anyone who speaks out in support of Palestinian rights and against Israel’s aggression are something entirely different. They are false and deceptive charges, often designed to draw attention away from Israel’s merciless assault.”
This petition follows the standard playbook of organizations like the Anti-Defamation League and StandWithUs, which routinely label pro-Palestinian advocacy as antisemitic in an effort to deflect from the reality of Israel’s actions. Instead of engaging with the overwhelming evidence of war crimes, the petitioners resort to distortion and intimidation tactics to suppress dissent.
As Dr. Eidelson so powerfully concludes:
“What they shouldn’t do, in my view, is disguise and defend unwavering support for Israel—regardless of its actions—by leveling charges of antisemitism against anyone who disagrees with their stance or makes them feel uncomfortable about it.”
The APA must take a clear stance against this dangerous manipulation—one that weaponizes Jewish identity to silence criticism of Israeli policies while erasing the many Jewish voices who stand against Israel’s military occupation and ongoing genocide in Gaza. To allow such tactics of suppression to persist within its own institutional spaces is a dereliction of the APA’s stated commitment to truth, ethics, and justice.
The Continued Smear Campaign Against Dr. Lara Sheehi
Perhaps the most egregious aspect of the petition is its continued targeting of Dr. Lara Sheehi, despite her full exoneration by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and an independent third-party investigation. The persistence of these false allegations is not only malicious but further proof that the petition lacks credibility and is driven by political repression rather than genuine concern for discrimination.
Palestine Legal’s Statement on Dr. Sheehi’s Exoneration
According to Palestine Legal, OCR not only dismissed the false claims against Dr. Sheehi but also found that George Washington University (GW) may have engaged in anti-Palestinian discrimination.
Furthermore, GW was forced to revise its protest policies and nondiscrimination policies after OCR determined that its actions disproportionately targeted Palestinian students and activists. Despite these clear legal conclusions, Psychologists Against Antisemitism continues to peddle baseless allegations, demonstrating a blatant disregard for truth and ethical accountability.
The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) Statement
Similarly, the ADC has denounced the attacks on Dr. Sheehi as part of a broader McCarthyist campaign aimed at silencing pro-Palestinian voices in academia. The APA must take a stance against such political suppression—especially when its own platforms are being misused to advance these malicious campaigns.
Shameful Selective Concern for Discrimination
The APA’s silence in the face of these intimidation tactics is both glaring and damning. When it comes to other oppressed groups, the APA has been vocal, issuing:
A formal apology for its role in perpetuating racism in psychological science.
A solidarity statement with Ukraine after Russia’s invasion.
Yet, when it comes to Palestinians, the APA not only refuses to take a stand—it enables the harassment and professional targeting of those who do. If the APA truly upholds equity, diversity, and inclusion, then why does it continue to ignore the systemic discrimination and repression of Palestinian scholars, students, and mental health professionals?
A Call to Reject Repression and Misinformation
The Palestine-Global Mental Health Network calls on the APA to immediately and unequivocally reject the false claims and repression tactics promoted by Psychologists Against Antisemitism. Specifically, we demand that the APA:
Condemn the McCarthyist attacks on scholars and professionals who speak out against Israeli apartheid and genocide.
Acknowledge that the petition is a politically motivated smear campaign designed to suppress Palestinian advocacy.
Recognize that misinformation—when tolerated—has serious consequences, as the APA’s own research has demonstrated.
Uphold the integrity of psychological science by rejecting ideological manipulation and ensuring that APA platforms are not used to spread disinformation and defamatory claims.
Address the growing issue of anti-Palestinian racism within its own ranks, particularly in how Palestinian members and allies have been harassed for speaking out.
The APA must decide whether it will allow itself to be used as a tool of political repression or stand on the side of truth, ethical scholarship, and justice for all people—including Palestinians.
We refuse to be silenced. The Palestine-Global Mental Health Network will continue to challenge these deceptive, harmful tactics and expose the weaponization of antisemitism to shield oppression and state violence.